Review Us On Google

Free telephone, office, or in hospital location



Inmate Versus Inmate Attacks in Georgia

by on August 11, 2011 » Add the first comment.

“[P]rison officials have a duty . . . to protect prisoners from violence at the hands of other prisoners.”  Cortes-Quinones v. Jimenez-Nettleship, 842F.2d 556, 558.  With overcrowding and prison budget constraints, inmate on inmate injury claims are on the rise.  These claims are generally based on the Eighth Amendment, which forbids cruel and unusual punishment and has been interpreted to protect convicted inmates against assaults by fellow inmates.  An inmate who is the victim of an attack by another inmate must prove, as a threshold issue, “deliberate indifference” by prison officials.  Farmer v. Brennen, 511 U. S. 825 (1994) defines deliberate indifference as “something more than negligence, but . . . something less than acts or omissions for the very purpose of causing harm or with knowledge that harm will result.”

It should be noted that in order to bring a lawsuit for an inmate attack under the Eighth Amendment, it’s necessary to first exhaust all administrative remedies.  “The Prison Litigation Reform Act requires that a prisoner exhaust available administrative remedies before bringing a federal action concerning prison conditions.” Griffin v. Arpaio, 557 F.3d 1117, 1119 (9th Cir. 2009) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a)).  This means that an inmate must “complete the administrative review process in accordance with the applicable procedural rules, including deadlines, as a precondition to bringing suit in federal court.” Marella v. Terhune, 568 F.3d 1024, 1027 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Ngo, 548 U.S. at 88).

Please contact us if you are a victim or the family of a victim injured as a result of prison violence that should have been prevented by prison officials.

Find more like this: News , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


1447 Peachtree Street, ste 414
Atlanta, GA 30309





Disclaimer: This website is intended for informational purposes only and is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship or serve as a substitute for legal counsel. If you are in need of specific legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately. Please note that communication with an attorney or staff member at Krause, Golomb & Witcher, LLC, does not by itself create an attorney- client relationship or constitute the provision or receipt of legal advice. Any communication from an attorney or staff member should be considered informational only, and should not be relied or acted upon until a formal attorney-client relationship is established via a written agreement signed by all parties. While we have achieved great results for many of our clients, we cannot guarantee the outcome of your potential case. Our firm services all of Georgia. We are authorized to to practice in all of the State Courts of Georgia, including all State Courts, Superior Courts, Georgia Court of Appeals and Georgia Supreme Court, as well as in the Federal Courts in the Northern District Court of Georgia and Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District Krause, Golomb & Witcher, LLC of Georgia, and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.