Review Us On Google

Free telephone, office, or in hospital location



Failure to Identify Automobile Collision In Bankruptcy Paperwork May Not Be Fatal

by on June 6, 2011 » Add the first comment.

An issue that injury victims don’t always think about is including their personal injury claims in their bankruptcy paperwork. Unfortunately, failing to list a potential injury claim can later be used as a defense to a personal injury lawsuit.

“Under the doctrine of judicial estoppel, a party is precluded from asserting a position in a judicial proceeding which is inconsistent with a position previously successfully asserted by it in a prior proceeding.  Therefore, the doctrine is commonly applied to preclude a bankruptcy debtor from pursuing a damages claim that the debtor failed to include in his or her assets in the bankruptcy petition because of a failure to include assets.”

This is a quote (citation and punctuation omitted) from Sevostiyanova v. Tempest Recovery Services, __ Ga. App. __ (Case No. A10A2181, decided January 26, 2011).

There is some wiggle room, however.  In CSX Transportation v. Howell, 296 Ga. App. 583, 586 (2009), the Georgia Court of Appeals carved our an exception to the general rule in Sevostiyanova.  From CSX Transportation:

“[A debtor who fails to list a claim as an asset] can avoid the application of judicial estoppel simply by filing a motion to amend . . . or reopen the debtor’s bankruptcy.”

The general rule and the exception were applied in Cox v. Hardwick, __ Ga. App. __ (Case No. A11A0626, decided June 10, 2011), resulting in a favorable outcome for the injured party.  In that case, a trial court granted summary judgment against an injury victim on the grounds that the injury victim had not listed her automobile collision in her bankruptcy.  The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the trial court, citing the exception set forth in CSX Transportation.

While debtors should always list potential personal injury claims, it seems Georgia courts are not inclined to strictly apply the doctrine of judicial estoppel in these situations.

Find more like this: News , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


1447 Peachtree Street, ste 414
Atlanta, GA 30309





Disclaimer: This website is intended for informational purposes only and is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship or serve as a substitute for legal counsel. If you are in need of specific legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately. Please note that communication with an attorney or staff member at Krause, Golomb & Witcher, LLC, does not by itself create an attorney- client relationship or constitute the provision or receipt of legal advice. Any communication from an attorney or staff member should be considered informational only, and should not be relied or acted upon until a formal attorney-client relationship is established via a written agreement signed by all parties. While we have achieved great results for many of our clients, we cannot guarantee the outcome of your potential case. Our firm services all of Georgia. We are authorized to to practice in all of the State Courts of Georgia, including all State Courts, Superior Courts, Georgia Court of Appeals and Georgia Supreme Court, as well as in the Federal Courts in the Northern District Court of Georgia and Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District Krause, Golomb & Witcher, LLC of Georgia, and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.